-
Nikolai Kosjar authored
The test data produces different results when it is run with libclang 3.6 and libclang 3.8. (lib)clang 3.8 will generate an error instead of a warning and suppress further diagnostics. See below. Use simpler test data that is agnostic to the different clang versions. $ cat input.cpp class X { X(X&&) noexcept; }; X::X(X&&) = default; int function() { } $ clang++-3.6 -fsyntax-only -std=c++11 input.cpp input.cpp:5:4: warning: 'X' is missing exception specification 'noexcept' X::X(X&&) = default; ^ noexcept input.cpp:2:5: note: previous declaration is here X(X&&) noexcept; ^ input.cpp:9:1: warning: control reaches end of non-void function [-Wreturn-type] } ^ 2 warnings generated. $ clang++-3.8 -fsyntax-only -std=c++11 input.cpp input.cpp:5:4: error: 'X' is missing exception specification 'noexcept' X::X(X&&) = default; ^ noexcept input.cpp:2:5: note: previous declaration is here X(X&&) noexcept; ^ 1 error generated. Change-Id: I6d786a8b87eb4438fa8db36540db9358181b9a5b Reviewed-by: David Schulz <david.schulz@theqtcompany.com>
b0320387